|
purebill.com Stephen Jones writing on billing and application migration |
![]() |
| . | Home | . | About | . | Archive | . | Links | . | Billing | . | Reference | . | Subscribe | . | Search | . | . |
Note 42: Additional rating features - Part 2Posted: 25 November 2007 MeteringSome networks, such as those of water and electricity utilities, generate consumption in terms of meter readings. Before rating can price the customer's consumption, it must determine the difference between the current and previous meter readings. When multiple meter readings are performed within a billing period, the rating process can look similar to the processing of interim consumption records since the full consumption is only 'known' when the billing cycle is performed.
TaxationTaxation provides its own complexities quite apart from those driven by the needs of rating. The tax types, rates, methods and jurisdictional exceptions must be determined for each of a biller's product offerings. This is made more complex when bundled rates and 'free' items are involved. The point when taxation is performed within billing is determined by factors that are related more to the legislation of the relevant taxation system and customer expectations than the billing process. Within the limitations imposed by the taxation regimen, the biller may choose to calculate and apply taxation within rating, or wait and calculate it within the regular billing cycle. Influences affecting taxation within rating include:
Aside from prepaid products, a transaction's price may be changed by later processing, such as rerating or discounting, and because of this it is desirable to delay the taxation process and do it only once against the transaction's (discounted) final price. Pretaxed transactions present special challenges because the information used to calculate the tax amounts may no longer be present in the transaction (i.e. details are presented as a fait accompli). Some pretaxed transactions may represent non-standard work performed by the biller on a 'time and materials' basis (e.g. installations). Billers can also process pretaxed transactions on behalf of third parties. These parties may be entities within the same business, or result from relationships with business partners. Since taxes may be fixed and/or variable in nature, recalculating them if the transaction's price changes (e.g. is rerated or discounted) can be problematic. In such circumstances the liability for correct tax calculation and collection is important to understand for both the biller and their partners. The question of financial liability also arises in Credit Management when customers don't pay their bills. Pretaxed charges may be processed through rating, but without any rating processing, to allow transactions to be collected and held in a common format (e.g. prebill presentation), to support tracking of financial amounts (e.g. cross-product rates) and non-financial resources (e.g. free minutes). Transaction DiscardingSome transactions will be passed from the network to rating, but the biller's business rules will not include them for billing. Transactions not intended for billing can be output to a 'discard' destination (file). Discards should be monitored to ensure that only appropriate network events are unbilled, and this may include reports that quantify the transaction numbers, classify them by type and indicate long-term trends. Discard examples for a phone network could include records for unanswered calls to busy phone numbers, calls to emergency phone numbers (police, ambulance), directory assistance, calls deemed too old, or calls shorter than a specified duration. CurrencyTransactions obtain their financial value (price) when they are rated. An attribute of that value is its currency. Older systems, or systems that are strictly domestic, may assume a default currency, but systems that bill across international boundaries must consider the attribute of currency in their processing. Multi-national business customers, roaming residential customers, and inter-network interconnect settlements can each drive a need for multi-currency processing. Currency distinctions that can be made include:
A customer can be billed using the same currency throughout the billing system, or perhaps the rating and billing currencies may be different. Where the biller is using one billing system to operate across multiple jurisdictions, each jurisdiction may operate under a different currency for its entire customer base. Conversions between different currencies within the billing process must be performed carefully to ensure that rounding is performed correctly, and that the appropriate exchange rates are used. The processing between different currencies can become complex quickly due to the impact of exchange rate movements. When implementing foreign currency processing, important questions that need to be worked through include: sourcing the exchange rates, agreeing on when rates will change, and who is liable for discrepancies when exchange rate movements occur. Transaction CategoriesWhere a biller operates a large product catalog (e.g. movies, music, books), and the catalog's content and price structures change frequently, billing may wish to avoid containing all the catalog's detail and instead operate using a categorisation approach. For example, songs can be thought of in catalog terms such as 'Top 40', 'Just Released', 'Classical', 'From the 1960's', 'The Beatles', 'Movie Soundtracks', or 'Children's Songs'. Each of these categories can be billed at a specific rate without needing to know explicitly which songs are in each category, or when that categorisation changes. Song details can be passed from the song supplying 'network' using a unique identifier, category and/or a description, allowing the billing process to remain aloof as to the entire catalog. As songs move between categories (as of specific dates), the category passed to billing with each song will change and so will the price charged. This approach allow new songs to be added to a central catalog as required, prices and categories can be changed regularly, customers can understand how they will be charged, and billing is isolated from, and less impacted by, the dynamic rate of change within the catalog. Detailed changes at the song level can be made without the need to reflect them in billing. Downstream invoice presentationIn addition to transactions that generate a financial impact, information-only transactions with no value can also be processed through rating. This allows transactions to be presented on the customer's bill alongside the billed amount. This information is not used in financial calculations, and may be passed electronically to (corporate) customers with the billing data for further analysis. For example, details of incoming phone calls that could not be connected can be captured and passed through rating and onto the bill. This information may useful for call centre businesses who may have an inadequate number of inbound toll free (1800) phone lines and be losing customers due to busy signals. Tags: Billing, Rating, Metering, Taxation [ Share with others ] Post this page to a social bookmarking site:
Links to other NotesPrevious - Note 41: Additional rating mechanisms Next - Note 43: Rating Transaction Storage Recent Updates
Sign up to receive a brief text email when new purebill postings are published. JUMP TO TOP
|
. |
| Comments welcome: stephenjones(at)purebill.com | Stephen Jones © 2004-2010 - Copyright and reprint rules | Sitemap | . |